My Shelf: The Period Pieces

This blog post is going to be really boring...

It's just me going through my DVD collection and talking about shows I own and why I like them. I'm making this so I can reflect on things that make me happy. But if you'd like, you're welcome to read, and if you'd like to share some of your favorite feel-good movies please post in the comments.

Now...

Lately, I've been adhering pretty close to my night shift schedule even on the days I don't work.

(Right now it's almost Five O' Clock in the morning so I should go to beds soon.)

One of the downsides to going to sleep in the morning is that, by the time I get up in the afternoon, most of everyone else's day has already over. So, when me and my sister/s want to do something fun together, it's usually something simple like watching a movie and washing each other's feet (I believe the correct term is pedicure), or usually we make yummy food (cream cheese rangoons are my favorite).

A lot of the time our exchange goes something like this:

Me: "You wanna do anything tonight?"

Debbers: "I have to do [homework etc.]. Go pick a DVD."

Me: [Hesitating] "You know what I'm going to pick..."

Debbers: "That's OK. Just pick something. "

I go through my DVD collection and select  handful. I try to pick out a variety.

Example:

-Charlie and the Chocolate Factory,
-Monsters Inc.
-Hunger Games
etc.

But really, like, most of my collection is made up of period pieces: comforting and re-watchable films. The kind of show you can put on in the background when you have to study or clean, or you can have a movie night and allow it to hold your attention for hours at a time.

They're perfect for when you're sick, or you have a lot of free time, or you're experiencing discomfort associated with a certain period of the month you need a pick-me-up. They're so versatile Much of the time these are what I end up picking.

With many of these stories, I've endeavored to read (or listen to) the book versions of the story before watching the films. In this post, I'll try to talk mostly about the movie versions (No promises though...)

Northanger Abbey (2007)

 This one is special to me because it's the first one I saw with my friend Britt. It brings back a lot of happy memories that I've tried to recapture and share with my family. It's one of the shorter of the films (feature length film, a lot of them are actually mini series).

What it's about: A girl from the early 1800 learns the difference between fantasy and reality in the big city (Bath, England), and in a big creepy mysterious house where she gets invited to stay.

Discussion: It seems like the common consensus among Austen fans is that the main character, Catherine Morland is a moron for getting so caught up in her fantasy novels.

I personally give her more credit; she's presented as ignorant from want of experience, not stupid. Also, she's presented as really competent in the world, despite her inexperience.

The irony in this is that a lot of people today read and watch Jane Austen's stories out of the same type of fantasy-seeking behavior, and often themselves get carried away with it!

Also, most of the books she's reading are psychological thriller/horror novels...so she's pretty hardcore!

Assets (aka other reasons you should watch this movie):

 JJ Feilds facial expressions:

Lizard People:

Catherine's Cheesy/Cute fantasy sequences:

Emma (2009)

I watched this one with my older sister Red, and she watched the whole thing! (It's a mini series, and Red doesn't have the attention span for a lot of shows, so that's quite an accomplishment ;)

What it's about: It's about a rich lady tries to play matchmaker with her friends and family and does it very badly because she has zero intuition about human nature.

Discussion:

I really did not like Emma's character when I read the book.

Emma is like Galinda in Wicked:

Emma: "Harriet, now that we're friends I'v decided to make you my new project."

Harriet: "You don't have to do that."

Emma: "I know. That's what makes me so nice!"

(To her credit, the point of this story is that that kind of frivolous mentality is hurtful and damaging.) I didn't feel like Emma had quite learned her lesson in the book, but I think she did in this movie. 

I didn't pick up on the social commentary aspect of it until I saw this film. The economic disparities between Emma, Frank, and Jane was the most interesting aspect of the story to me.

 I also like that Emma he's one of the few Jane Austen heroines who has no economic or social incentive to get married, and who ends up being with a guy because she chooses to, not because expected to.

So go Emma!

Assets:

Baby!Jane Fairfax

(dawww!)

Adult Jane Fairfax

(Perfect casting is perfect)

Facial Expressions

Witty Banter:

Proof Regency Women Got Pregnant:

North and South (2004)

What it's about: A girl becomes a socio/political activist after being uprooted to an industrialized part of her country and witnessing the economic disparity among the business owners and the laboring class.

Discussion: The writer of this story, Elizabeth Gaskell, was a bestie of Charles Dickens, so social justice is a big part of the story (Also, death is treated as a fact of life.) Despite all the depressiveness, this mini-series is positively squee worthy for three major reasons:

• Thornton Oakenshield before the beard:

(In his spare time, likes fruit-baskets, reading, and studying ancient philosophy.)

(also, an emo mamma's boy)

Margaret "I've got more balls then anyone else in this story" Hale:

("Never mind I'll do it myself!")

Prolonged (one sided) sexual tension:

Assets: (aside from what's mentioned above)

No one will appreciate who hasn't read the book but this guy: 

Is Nicolas Higgins, the union leader and Margaret's bff. Also plays in Downton Abbey, the only character I loved from that show.

Pride and Prejudice (2005)

What it's about: A girl from a middle class family decides it's OK to marry a really rich guy, even if he said something that was mildly insulting to her that one time at a party a while ago (seriously, it is that lame)

Discussion: The plot for this one isn't great. The stakes (The girl cannot inherit money from her dad once he dies becuz she's a girl) are not eminent. The real fun in this story is the characters and the family dynamics. As a member of a family with a lot of sisters, I guess I relate to it on some level (even though my sisters are NOTHING like the Bennett girls). The Bennett family is fun to watch esspecially after their cousin, the male heir to the Bennet fortune arrives:

Assets:

Socially Awkward Mr Darcy

Pride and Prejudice (1995)

What it's about: See above.

Discussion/Assets: This is the preferred version for Austen purists and women who came of age at or before 1995 for two main reasons; 1) it's a mini-series so its super long and has more dialogue from the book 2) Colin Firth is in it.

(I feel really, really sorry for that man...)

Also...

Mr Wickam is devilishly charming and good looking

I'm not going to say the acting is bad in this one (because it isn't) but I will say that they put a different, less sympathetic spin on characters like Charlotte Lucas, Mr Collins, Mom and Dad Bennet, Mary Bennet etc. More reflective of Elizabeth's unforgiving mindset at the beginning of the story than how people behave in real life.

Persuasion (1995)

(When crisis arise, Anne and Fred take charge)

I was talking with my aunt about this one and it was funny that she had a completely different take on what the story meant than I did. If you happen to have a different one, I'd love to hear about it in the comments. 

What it's about: An old maid gets a second chance at love...if only her ex-fiance will ask her again.

Discussion:

A lot of this story deals with regret. Eight years ago Anne made a decision not to get married because her BFF/mentor told her it was a bad idea for both her and her intended. This decision, while a reasonable one, did not make Anne happy.  She's trapped in a web of her own making and the only way out is marriage.

My aunt says this story is about how you don't have to be ashamed of doing what your mentors tell you to do, even if it is ultimately a decision that makes you unhappy, because when your mentors have your best interests at heart.

I see it as a story about how there are uncertainties even in the most cautious and calculated decsions in life.

 In the novel, this is reinforced in the last paragraphs of the book, where Austen notes that life as a Colonels wife is hardly more secure than life as the nobleman's daughter. Her husband could be called away at any time, life at sea is dangerous and people die every day. (Hardly a romantic ending, but in Austen's world true love doth NOT conquer all.) Luckily, in this adaption, Anne proves she is totally up for that challenge, following him out to sea.

Good on you, Anne!

Assets:

Amanda Roots facial expressions

(all two of them, seriously it's so cute...)

Ciaran Hines tortured face 

(Baby don't hurt me...don't hurt me no more...)

Prolonged Sexual Tension:

Persuasion (2007)

What it's about: See above

Discussion/Assets:

(Nope, I was totally not looking!)

To be honest, I think these two versions are very similar. And both very good. I think Anne gets more dialogue in this version, more facial expressiveness in the other one.

She also gets to re-set her nephew's dislocated shoulder in this one, which is cool.
:)

Sense and Sensibility (1995)

What it's about: These girl's dad dies, and their step-brother is a scumbag and won't provide for them like he promised. So they have to move to the beach, where their distant relations resolve to help the older girl's find rich boyfriends.

Discussion: Emma Thompson wrote the screenplay and won an academy award. She did a really good job on the adaption, and her character Elinor is awesome (is one of my favorite heroines). However, her boyfriend Edward is a wuss and I don't know what she sees in him at all. Perhaps regency virtues are sometimes so far removed from what would see as honorable today, or maybe Edward really is a big fraidy-cat and Elinor is just into that type of guy...

Also, her sister Marianne should not be allowed to pick her own boyfriends.

Assets:

Alan Rickman Reading Poetry

Also, the Dashwood brother is played by the same guy who plays Hugo Horton in Vicar of Dibley.

Sense and Sensibility (2008)

What it's about: See above.

Discussion: This one begins with a sex scene. Aside from being hard to place ("What?! This didn't happen in the book!!") my dad happened to be in the room at the time and it was super awkward. I fast forwarded a little bit, and I later pieced together that it was Howard Stark seducing Colonel Brandon's niece.

Assets:

We get to actually see a little more of what is happening on Colonel Brandon's life. A lot is just suggested in the other version. I really like that he had a warm, fatherly relationship with his niece and was super supportive of her. He even looked happy with the baby, which surprised me, but it made me like the character even more.

Jane Eyre (2004)

What it's about: An orphaned girl who was subject to psychological torture as a child grows up, gets a job, comes to terms with her less than ideal childhood, and eventually moves on with her life.

Discussion: This one is a mini-series. My sister Keamy can't watch it because the first episode deals with some seriously sad stuff from Jane Eyre's childhood.

(Kind of like Jean Valjean, but she never stole the loaf of bread. Also...typhus and tuberculosis and red rooms!)

I personally find her story the most inspirational of any on my shelf. Jane Eyre is one female hero I'd love to be like.

Ann Dibb even used her as an example in her conf. address on the 13th article of faith.

(It starts at about 06:20)

Assets: 

• Jane's monologue: Fantastic Acting Is Fantastic

• Mr Rochester being a sly little flirt: 

("No Jane I totes cannot walk by myself, you need to put your arms around me. Like that, thanks.")

• Its also the only version that did any justice to St John Rivers' character. 

Mansfield Park (2007)

What it's about: A young girl is adopted as a foster-child and grows up with her wealthy cousins. Ends up the least screwed-up of the siblings.

Discussion: There's a really interesting example of nature vs. nurture in this story, unfortunately this movie doesn't have enough screen time to explore it in detail. It doesn't go into a lot of detail about Fanny Price's journey, or why she is the way she is, but it was still really sweet and I was still rooting for Fanny and Edmund to get together (like I was in the book).


Assets:
Rose  Billie Piper:

Peggy Carter as the extremely likable, but ultimately scheming and cold-hearted Mary Crawford:

Jarvis and Blake Ritson:

Wives and Daughters (1999)

What it's about: A girl who is a doctor's daughter has to grows up and deal with her dad's remarriage and her new step sister. Also, she has a huuuugge crush on a nerd.


Discussion: Another story by Elizabeth Gaskell. The book is horribly long, the mini-series is more reasonably paced. Also, is there a term for a female bromance? Because that's what Molly and Hyacinth have.

(^^^Looked it up, it's called a "Womance" bahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahaha)

Assets:

Nerdy love:

Smart Alek Prof. Dumbledore:

Commodore Norrington BECKETT (how could I have made such a mistake? It's not good business!)/Mr Collins as a romantic figure:

(Whut?)

And the most sweet/awkward reunion scene ever:

(Seriously, even my dad thought it was cute)

Cranford Seasons 1 & 2

What it's about: A clique of women who live in a town have a hard time dealing with change. There's also a doctor, a Gypsy boy, a rich elderly lady, the guy who manages her estate, a lady who makes hats,,,yeah this one's all over the place

Discussion: It's kind of like the hobbit, it's a good story, but only if you forget about the source material.

Really this film is loosely based on a handful of Elizabeth Gaskell's short stories, only one of them actually takes place in the fictional town of Cranford. They did a decent job of tying a variety of stories together, but because they tried to romantacise everything the kinda lost touch with the point of the story.

Assets:

 Thomas William Hiddleston

• Doctor Harrison deals with life and death.

I'd really like to tell you all about the book versions, because they're so much better
and I really don't want to forget them either.

But that's a topic for another post.

M: Moderation

In Biology 101 my teacher explained the metabolic principles involved in the Atkins diet, which was becoming popular at the time. She explained the diet involved in cutting carbohydrate intake, which affected how the body metabolizes calories and uses energy. She explained that the Atkins diet was effective in weight loss, however, it was ultimately bad for your health in the long term.

"Don't do the Atkins, it's not a good idea. I believe in all things in moderation." She concluded.

The sentiment surprised me, because the teacher was obese.

(If this observation offends you...you have every right to be offended. It was the observation of a 15 year old kid trying to make sense of the world around her. I apologize for my thoughts...which I have never before voiced...and ask that you hear me out as I try to explain something that's on my mind.)

It was evident to me that this teacher didn't really know what moderation was. Or, if she did, she ignored the principles of it...which is basically the same as ignorance. I thought,  "Well, obesity isn't good for your health, either."

So which was worse?

1) Excluding a whole food group to get your weight within a healthy range, or
2) eating in excess in the name of "Moderation"?

(Yes, I do realize that some people have metabolic, psychiatric, or other health-related disorders that contribute to an increased body weight and that it is unfair to assume that they are all "eating in excess". I believe those individuals should seek medical attention and that the rest of us should pay VERY CLOSE ATTENTION TO WHAT I'M ABOUT TO SAY...)

Lately, I've been thinking of another question:

WHY are those the ONLY two options?????

I think the reason is because they're the only two options people feel comfortable with. We are perfectly capable of cutting things out of our lives completely, just as we are capable of over-indulging ourselves in something that we find desirable. But there is no middle road. We have no concept of what healthy (moderate) behavior actually is.

So, here is a little run down on the term.

The word "Moderation" is an action word, it refers to a process of lessening extremes.

To act within a realm of behavior that is "Moderate" we must be able to define what "excess" is and what "deficit" is.

 Dictionary.com defines moderation as-"keeping within reasonable or proper limits; not extreme, excessive, or intense"


Wikinary defines it as-"the process of eliminating or lessening extremes"


But my personal favorite definition for this word comes from Urban Dictionary- Moderation: A virtue that permits all vices

Some examples of what moderation is NOT:

• An excuse to have another cookie/slice of bacon/soda because you had an apple this morning.

• Sampling a wider array of unhealthy things at the buffet. 

• Moderation is not a justification for stupid behavior because, "Oh, I haven't tried cannabis before."

• Dismissing or cutting people out of a group conversation because they aren't interesting enough. (Or alternatively, keeping your mouth shut when you have something to say because "no one will listen to me anyways".)

It really bugs me how people use this word as an excuse to do stupid things just because they aren't able to control their own appetites for a particular behavior such as eating, gaming, communication, or drug/alcohol consumption.

I watched this video thinking the point was going to be that one type of excess is "better" then the other, but they make a good point towards the end of the video. 

A principle that is important in the practice of moderation is restraint, which is something that I believe Western Civilization (and humanity in general) knows very little about. Moderation means making little choices that seem inconsequential but ultimately have a huge impact our health/well-being, relationships, and even our personality. 

Another principle is awareness. In interpersonal discussion, I've noticed that many people really do have a knowledge deficit regarding healthy behavior, resulting partially from culture they grew up in. 

I've heard people say "It's their choice how they want to live their own lives" but I don't think it is really "their choice" if they don't know any better. 

Here's to knowing better, here's to doing better, here's to being better.

The Facebook Experiment: Results

I'm not going to post anything substantial here.

It took 14 days. 

Despite the futility, I am still an addict.

Pinterest is my methadone.

I warned you.

Question Marks and Exclamation Points

This picture brings a couple of things to mind. Some of them are hard to articulate in any other way then...

WHY?!?!

Why would someone choose this?!?  The concept is really confusing to me.

I realize there are quite a few people who do it and have no reservations but I personally struggle to understand it. Forever, there will be a person with 'your name on it' (So to speak) who you....the donor...will have nothing to do with.

Back when I was taking Anatomy, I had a lab partner who, along with her husband, had donated their respective gametes to a service like this.

The answer, for my lab partner, was money. Both the husband and wife were going to school and needed help paying tuition and expenses for themselves and their children.

I remember thinking, and trying to empathize: "Wow, it must be really tempting, having a simple procedure done and not have to worry about how you're going to pay for school."

Then recently I saw the picture above...and saw how much you actually get for it.

4500 dollars?

 That's all?? That's NOTHING?!

 REALLY?!

UGH, Just NO!!

I cannot conceive of such a sacrifice with so feeble a compensation!

Pathetic!