Showing posts with label V. Show all posts
Showing posts with label V. Show all posts

Thursday, May 29, 2014

Talking Sh*t

I don't listen to talk radio a lot anymore. (I have the internet :P). But for some reason its illegal to browse and drive. So when I can't bear to listen to the Hot Chelle Rae CD I've had in my player for over a year, and there's static on Air1, I break down and turn to KFI.

This morning on my drive home from work, I turned on the radio and listened to Phil Handel.

He was talking about this

As side from being really sad to listen to, it also annoyed me, especially because Handel and Co. specialize in irreverence and sarcasm. To my "I've not listened to talk radio in a while" ears, it sounded a bit like what I would imagine an internet message board would sound like if you could hear the trolls' voices. (Not that that is an inherently bad thing, obviously it holds my attention enough to keep me awake on my way home).

But later in the day I got in the car again and this time the afternoon hosts John and Ken were talking about yet another story of a young person shooting people because he was mad.

I found their account of this story similarly distasteful. The sensationalist and defeatist attitude with which these guys discuss mass murder is really starting to bug me. Its pretty much taken for granite that this behavior is 'just a part of human nature' and 'nothing we do will change it'.

One of the two hosts even made the analogy between these incidences and reality TV stardom: The perpetrators want to show everyone what they're going through; they want to be famous for it. (I don't watch reality-TV except for the ones where they fix a house, make a wedding dress, take care of farm animals...so I'm not quite familiar with that concept.)

I don't think it's wrong to report this kind of stuff but what gets me is that these people...by their own admission...are encouraging a sociopathic mentality (that they themselves have actually IDENTIFIED!) through their manner of "reporting".  If indeed these evil people are doing this to get attention, WHY THE HECK ARE WE GIVING IT TO THEM???!?!??!?!

We may indeed be doomed to live in a world where bad things happen, but we are spiritually damned if we glorify that kind of evil.

When I was in Australia (Yes I'm about to become one of those "When I was on my mission/foreign exchange/australian adventure" type of people) I got to plan the part of the trip when we visited Tasmania. 

One of the places I was very interested to see was Port Arthur.



Port Arthur is a historical prison in Tasmania. You can read a bit about my visit there here.
One thing I didn't share in that post is what I learned (and didn't learn) about an incident that occurred there in 1994 that resulted in the deaths of 35 people.

I researched the historical site where this took place (On wikipedia, the port arthur website, multiple tourism sites, magazine articles, a guidebook etc).

 I thought it was interesting that  they said things like 'If you visit Port Arthur or the neighboring community please be respectful and don't ask the resident's about it unless they offer to tell you' but it wasn't until I visited the memorial site that Red pointed out how low-key everyone was being about it. It was respected, not sensationalized. Even though we'd read and heard about this incident from multiple sources and even though we were STANDING IN THE EXACT SPOT where it took place, we'd come across no references to the identity of the shooter or his/her motivation for the shooting, or his/her ultimate fate.

Even though there is a difference between breaking news (like what you'd hear on the news talk) and something-that-happened-twenty-years-ago, I can't help but wonder what it would be like if people like Timothy McVeigh and the Boston Marathon Bombers didn't get glamorized for the evil things they did. If they just disappeared an no one talked about their court-date or their court-sentence, their repeals or execution date. 

Would people who are psychologically disturbed be as tempted to follow in their footsteps if the ego gratification wasn't there? 

I can't say I think I'll ever find out the answer to that, as a society we love our celebrities (even/especially the bad ones).

There's a quote I read a while back, at the time I thought it was really cheesy and stupid because it uses turd-words one to many times, but it it keeps coming to mind:

"It's a shitty world and shit happens, but we don't have to bathe in shit."

As of today, I still don't know who was behind the shooting at Port Arthur or what the person's motivation was. Maybe someday curiosity will bite me and I'll look it up, but for now its kind of nice to know that I don't have to/need to know. There's a difference between living a sheltered lifestyle and avoiding stepping in shit.

Tuesday, November 8, 2011

How to Enjoy a Movie You Don't Like

I really liked the movie Thor. So when the statement "Thor will return in The Avengers" popped up at the end of the credits I was thinking "Oh, cool. Now I have to see all of those other superhero movies to find out who the avengers are." I like superheroes, so I thought I'd enjoy the other "Avenger-prequel" movies.

Not so...

Greatfully, I did not buy the movie "Iron Man", I rented it. I found that the main character is witty and funny and a smart aleck. However, every funny thing he says in the movie is underscored by the thought "Wow, I really don't like this guy, he is not a nice guy."

Oddly enough, IRON MAN basically has the same plot as Thor but, in my opinion, it has poorer acting/directing and poorer character development.

Tony Stark (Iron Man) should have been having this transformational journey, but I just couldn't feel for him because they never showed any real substance to him. It's like all the material was there; the father issues, the traumatic hostage situation, the death of his friend, and his resolve to live a better life...but when he says "I shouldn't be alive, unless it was for a reason." I don't buy it. Maybe it's just supposed to convey the type of man he is; the kind who doesn't express or understand true emotion well, but I don't feel they presented this idea well either.

SO....

While my sisters and I were watching this movie that we didn't really like we noticed something interesting:

One of the characters is named "Obadiah"
...........................................
DO YOU KNOW WHAT THAT MEANS?????


IT MEANS HE WAS NAMED AFTER A VEGGITALES CHARACTER!!!!

We started shouting out Veggitale lines at every plot twist...including:
"Obadiah Bumbly"
and
"Oh, Brother, Obadiah, thou art so...up tight. Prethee, let the brotheren playeth a little checkers."

Eventually we likened most of the main cast with his/her veggie counterpart here is what we came up with

'Tony Stark vs. Larry the Cucumber.'
Both have big egos and BIGGER alter egos. They dress up in suits as superheroes.

'Agent Coleson vs Bob the Tomato'
Both seem intelligent are not taken seriously. Bob is a bit more of a character, but they both are trying to keep control under difficult circumstances and don't get much respect. We haven't seen a whole lot of Agent Coleson as a person yet (I hope we do). But honestly, I could see Agent Coleson's full name being "Robert Coleson".

'Pepper Potts vs. Petunia Rhubarb'
I noticed their voices are pretty similar and both are kind. But Petunia actually has a backbone (metaphorically speaking), while Pepper's heart and will belong to a guy who doesn't respect her.

Obadiah Stane vs Mr. Nezzer
Both are cuddly, old villans and slightly insane.
Stan Lee vs Pa Grape
I just saw the Stan Lee cameo and thought of him saying: "And for this I missed taco night?"

This made the movie much more enjoyable.

Bottom line: Veggietales characters are funnier and have more substance then some live action characters.